[gpfsug-discuss] Creation time
Jez Tucker
jtucker at pixitmedia.com
Thu Oct 1 14:56:33 BST 2026
Allo
See gpfs_set_times_path() in gpfs.h
Best,
Jez
On 01/10/2026 14:34, Jonathan Buzzard via gpfsug-discuss wrote:
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
On 01/10/2026 14:22, Ahmed Essam Mahrous Gaber Elmazaty via gpfsug-
discuss wrote:
In addition to rsync, we have migrated to GPFS using AFM and it
preserves all the metadata including modification timestamps Best
regards,
If it does then a GPFS API must exist even if undocumented for modifying
it. However I don't think it does.
Note that creation/birth time is not POSIX and GPFS only acquired it in
version 3.2 from memory, at the same time as MS-DOS attributes were
added. Presumably added as part of being able to mount GPFS on Windows,
with the fun fact you needed a GPFS file system created under 3.2 or
later to do so.
It is a common misconception that ctime is a creation time, it is in
fact the time you last changed permissions.
I am talking about the "Creation Time" as reported by mmlsattr -L or on
XFS the Birth time you see on when stating the file.
JAB.
--
Jonathan A. Buzzard Tel: +44141-5483420
HPC System Administrator, ARCHIE-WeSt.
University of Strathclyde, John Anderson Building, Glasgow. G4 0NG
_______________________________________________
gpfsug-discuss mailing list
gpfsug-discuss at gpfsug.org
http://gpfsug.org/mailman/listinfo/gpfsug-discuss_gpfsug.org
--
Jez Tucker
VP Product Development
+44 (0776) 419 3820
jtucker at pixitmedia.com<mailto:jtucker at pixitmedia.com>
[Pixitmedia]<https://www.pixitmedia.com>
www.pixitmedia.com<https://www.pixitmedia.com>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://gpfsug.org/pipermail/gpfsug-discuss_gpfsug.org/attachments/20261001/fb9f8e65/attachment.html>
More information about the gpfsug-discuss
mailing list