Sven, What about the stability of the new protocol nodes vs the old cNFS? If you remember, back in the day, cNFS would sometimes have a problem and reboot the whole server itself. Obviously this was problematic if it's one of the few servers running your cluster. I assume this is different now with the Protocol Servers? On Sat, Mar 5, 2016 at 1:40 PM, Marc A Kaplan <makaplan at us.ibm.com> wrote: > Indeed it seems to just add overhead and expense to split what can be done > by one node over two nodes! > > > _______________________________________________ > gpfsug-discuss mailing list > gpfsug-discuss at spectrumscale.org > http://gpfsug.org/mailman/listinfo/gpfsug-discuss > > -- Zach Giles zgiles at gmail.com -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://gpfsug.org/pipermail/gpfsug-discuss_gpfsug.org/attachments/20160305/d1606263/attachment.html>