[gpfsug-discuss] How to ignore ib_rdma_nic_unrecognized event on nodes where an IB link is not used.

[Ran Pergamin]

Hi All,

My customer has some nodes in the cluster which current have their second IB port disabled.
Spectrum scale 4.2.3 update 13.

Port 1 is defined in verbs port, yet sysmoncon monitor and reports error on port 2 despite not being used.

I found an old listing claiming it will be solved in in 4.2.3-update5, yet nothing in 4.2.3-update7 release notes, about it.

https://www.spectrumscale.org/pipermail/gpfsug-discuss/2018-January/004395.html

Filters in sensor file say filters are not support + apply to ALL nodes, so no relevant where I need to ignore it.

Any idea how can I disable the check of sensor on mlx4_0/2 on some of the nodes ?


Node name:      cff003-ib0.chemfarm
Node status:    DEGRADED
Status Change:  2019-05-29 12:29:49

Component      Status        Status Change            Reasons
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
GPFS           TIPS          2019-05-29 12:29:48      gpfs_pagepool_small
NETWORK        DEGRADED      2019-05-29 12:29:49      ib_rdma_link_down(mlx4_0/2), ib_rdma_nic_down(mlx4_0/2), ib_rdma_nic_unrecognized(mlx4_0/2)
  ib0          HEALTHY       2019-05-29 12:29:49      -
  mlx4_0/1     HEALTHY       2019-05-29 12:29:49      -
  mlx4_0/2     FAILED        2019-05-29 12:29:49      ib_rdma_link_down, ib_rdma_nic_down, ib_rdma_nic_unrecognized
FILESYSTEM     HEALTHY       2019-05-29 12:29:48      -
  apps         HEALTHY       2019-05-29 12:29:48      -
  data         HEALTHY       2019-05-29 12:29:48      -
PERFMON        HEALTHY       2019-05-29 12:29:33      -
THRESHOLD      HEALTHY       2019-05-29 12:29:18      -


Thanks !

Regards,
Ran

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://gpfsug.org/pipermail/gpfsug-discuss_gpfsug.org/attachments/20190529/e100c48c/attachment.htm>