[gpfsug-discuss] high cpu usage by mmfsadm

[Bryan Banister]

I wouldn’t call that normal… probably take a gpfs.snap and open a PMR to get the quickest answer from IBM support,
-B

From: gpfsug-discuss-bounces at spectrumscale.org <gpfsug-discuss-bounces at spectrumscale.org> On Behalf Of KG
Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2018 9:43 AM
To: gpfsug main discussion list <gpfsug-discuss at spectrumscale.org>
Subject: [gpfsug-discuss] high cpu usage by mmfsadm

[EXTERNAL EMAIL]
One of our scale node shows 30-50% CPU utilisation by mmfsadm while filesystem is being accessed. Is this normal?

(The node is configured as server node but not a manager node for any filesystem or NSD)

________________________________

Note: This email is for the confidential use of the named addressee(s) only and may contain proprietary, confidential, or privileged information and/or personal data. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any review, dissemination, or copying of this email is strictly prohibited, and requested to notify the sender immediately and destroy this email and any attachments. Email transmission cannot be guaranteed to be secure or error-free. The Company, therefore, does not make any guarantees as to the completeness or accuracy of this email or any attachments. This email is for informational purposes only and does not constitute a recommendation, offer, request, or solicitation of any kind to buy, sell, subscribe, redeem, or perform any type of transaction of a financial product. Personal data, as defined by applicable data privacy laws, contained in this email may be processed by the Company, and any of its affiliated or related companies, for potential ongoing compliance and/or business-related purposes. You may have rights regarding your personal data; for information on exercising these rights or the Company’s treatment of personal data, please email datarequests at jumptrading.com.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://gpfsug.org/pipermail/gpfsug-discuss_gpfsug.org/attachments/20181129/e5b8bb51/attachment-0002.htm>