[gpfsug-discuss] sublocks per block in GPFS 5.0
Marc A Kaplan
makaplan at us.ibm.com
Fri Mar 30 17:45:41 BST 2018
Apparently, a small mistake in that developer works post.
I always advise testing of new features on a scratchable system...
Here's what I see on my test system:
#mmcrfs mak -F /vds/mn.nsd -A no -T /mak -B 16M -f 1K -i 1K
Value '1024' for option '-f' is out of range. Valid values are 4096
through 524288.
# mmcrfs mak -F /vds/mn.nsd -A no -T /mak -B 16M -f 4K -i 1K
(runs okay)
# mmlsfs mak
flag value description
------------------- ------------------------
-----------------------------------
-f 4096 Minimum fragment (subblock)
size in bytes
-i 1024 Inode size in bytes
-I 32768 Indirect block size in bytes
...
-B 16777216 Block size
...
-V 18.00 (5.0.0.0) File system version
...
--subblocks-per-full-block 4096 Number of subblocks per full
block
...
From: valleru at cbio.mskcc.org
To: gpfsug main discussion list <gpfsug-discuss at spectrumscale.org>
Date: 03/30/2018 12:21 PM
Subject: [gpfsug-discuss] sublocks per block in GPFS 5.0
Sent by: gpfsug-discuss-bounces at spectrumscale.org
Hello Everyone,
I am a little bit confused with the number of sub-blocks per block-size of
16M in GPFS 5.0.
In the below documentation, it mentions that the number of sub-blocks per
block is 16K, but "only for Spectrum Scale RAID"
https://developer.ibm.com/storage/2018/01/11/spectrum-scale-variant-sub-blocks/
However, when i created the filesystem “without” spectrum scale RAID. I
still see that the number of sub-blocks per block is 1024.
mmlsfs <filesystem> --subblocks-per-full-block
flag value description
------------------- ------------------------
-----------------------------------
--subblocks-per-full-block 1024 Number of subblocks per full
block
So May i know if the sub-blocks per block-size really 16K? or am i missing
something?
Regards,
Lohit_______________________________________________
gpfsug-discuss mailing list
gpfsug-discuss at spectrumscale.org
https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__gpfsug.org_mailman_listinfo_gpfsug-2Ddiscuss&d=DwICAg&c=jf_iaSHvJObTbx-siA1ZOg&r=cvpnBBH0j41aQy0RPiG2xRL_M8mTc1izuQD3_PmtjZ8&m=HNrrMTazEN37eiIyxj9LWFMt2v1vCWeYuAGeHXXgIN8&s=Q6RUpDte4cePcCa_VU9ClyOvHMwhOWg8H1sRVLv9ocU&e=
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://gpfsug.org/pipermail/gpfsug-discuss_gpfsug.org/attachments/20180330/4a38dd8d/attachment.htm>
More information about the gpfsug-discuss
mailing list