[gpfsug-discuss] V5 Experience -- maxblocksize

Sven Oehme oehmes at gmail.com
Fri Feb 9 15:08:38 GMT 2018


you can only create a filesystem with a blocksize of what ever current
maxblocksize
is set. let me discuss with felipe what//if we can share here to solve
this.

sven

On Fri, Feb 9, 2018 at 6:59 AM Grunenberg, Renar <
Renar.Grunenberg at huk-coburg.de> wrote:

> Hallo Sven,
>
> that stated a mmcrfs ‘newfs’ -B 4M is possible if the maxblocksize is 1M
> (from the upgrade) without the requirement to change this parameter
> before?? Correct or not?
>
> Regards
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Renar Grunenberg
> Abteilung Informatik – Betrieb
>
> HUK-COBURG
> Bahnhofsplatz
> 96444 Coburg
> Telefon: 09561 96-44110
> Telefax: 09561 96-44104
> E-Mail: Renar.Grunenberg at huk-coburg.de
> Internet: www.huk.de
> HUK-COBURG Haftpflicht-Unterstützungs-Kasse kraftfahrender Beamter
> Deutschlands a. G. in Coburg
> Reg.-Gericht Coburg HRB 100; St.-Nr. 9212/101/00021
> Sitz der Gesellschaft: Bahnhofsplatz, 96444 Coburg
> Vorsitzender des Aufsichtsrats: Prof. Dr. Heinrich R. Schradin.
> Vorstand: Klaus-Jürgen Heitmann (Sprecher), Stefan Gronbach, Dr. Hans Olav
> Herøy, Dr. Jörg Rheinländer (stv.), Sarah Rössler, Daniel Thomas (stv.).
> Diese Nachricht enthält vertrauliche und/oder rechtlich geschützte
> Informationen.
> Wenn Sie nicht der richtige Adressat sind oder diese Nachricht irrtümlich
> erhalten haben,
> informieren Sie bitte sofort den Absender und vernichten Sie diese
> Nachricht.
> Das unerlaubte Kopieren sowie die unbefugte Weitergabe dieser Nachricht
> ist nicht gestattet.
>
> This information may contain confidential and/or privileged information.
> If you are not the intended recipient (or have received this information
> in error) please notify the
> sender immediately and destroy this information.
> Any unauthorized copying, disclosure or distribution of the material in
> this information is strictly forbidden.
> ------------------------------
>
> *Von:* gpfsug-discuss-bounces at spectrumscale.org [mailto:
> gpfsug-discuss-bounces at spectrumscale.org] *Im Auftrag von *Sven Oehme
> *Gesendet:* Freitag, 9. Februar 2018 15:48
>
>
> *An:* gpfsug main discussion list <gpfsug-discuss at spectrumscale.org>
> *Betreff:* Re: [gpfsug-discuss] V5 Experience -- maxblocksize
>
>
>
> Renar,
>
>
>
> if you specify the filesystem blocksize of 1M during mmcr you don't have
> to restart anything. scale 5 didn't change anything on the behaviour of
> maxblocksize change while the cluster is online, it only changed the
> default passed to the blocksize parameter for create a new filesystem. one
> thing we might consider doing is changing the command to use the current
> active  maxblocksize as input for mmcrfs if maxblocksize is below current
> default.
>
>
>
> Sven
>
>
>
>
>
> On Fri, Feb 9, 2018 at 6:30 AM Grunenberg, Renar <
> Renar.Grunenberg at huk-coburg.de> wrote:
>
> Felipe, all,
>
> first thanks for clarification, but what was the reason for this logic? If
> i upgrade to Version 5 and want to create new filesystems, and the
> maxblocksize is on 1M, we must shutdown the hole cluster to change this to
> the defaults to use the new one default. I had no understanding for that
> decision. We are at 7 x 24h availability with our cluster today, we had no
> real maintenance window here! Any circumvention are welcome.
>
>
>
> Regards Renar
>
>
>
> Renar Grunenberg
> Abteilung Informatik – Betrieb
>
>
>
> HUK-COBURG
> Bahnhofsplatz
> 96444 Coburg
>
> Telefon:
>
> 09561 96-44110
>
> Telefax:
>
> 09561 96-44104
>
> E-Mail:
>
> Renar.Grunenberg at huk-coburg.de
>
> Internet:
>
> www.huk.de
>
> HUK-COBURG Haftpflicht-Unterstützungs-Kasse kraftfahrender Beamter
> Deutschlands a. G. in Coburg
> Reg.-Gericht Coburg HRB 100; St.-Nr. 9212/101/00021
> Sitz der Gesellschaft: Bahnhofsplatz, 96444 Coburg
> Vorsitzender des Aufsichtsrats: Prof. Dr. Heinrich R. Schradin.
> Vorstand: Klaus-Jürgen Heitmann (Sprecher), Stefan Gronbach, Dr. Hans Olav
> Herøy, Dr. Jörg Rheinländer (stv.), Sarah Rössler, Daniel Thomas (stv.).
>
> Diese Nachricht enthält vertrauliche und/oder rechtlich geschützte
> Informationen.
> Wenn Sie nicht der richtige Adressat sind oder diese Nachricht irrtümlich
> erhalten haben,
> informieren Sie bitte sofort den Absender und vernichten Sie diese
> Nachricht.
> Das unerlaubte Kopieren sowie die unbefugte Weitergabe dieser Nachricht
> ist nicht gestattet.
>
> This information may contain confidential and/or privileged information.
> If you are not the intended recipient (or have received this information
> in error) please notify the
> sender immediately and destroy this information.
> Any unauthorized copying, disclosure or distribution of the material in
> this information is strictly forbidden.
> ------------------------------
>
> *Von:* gpfsug-discuss-bounces at spectrumscale.org [mailto:
> gpfsug-discuss-bounces at spectrumscale.org] *Im Auftrag von *Felipe Knop
> *Gesendet:* Freitag, 9. Februar 2018 14:59
> *An:* gpfsug main discussion list <gpfsug-discuss at spectrumscale.org>
> *Betreff:* Re: [gpfsug-discuss] V5 Experience -- maxblocksize
>
>
>
> All,
>
> Correct. There is no need to change the value of 'maxblocksize' for
> existing clusters which are upgraded to the 5.0.0 level. If a new file
> system needs to be created with a block size which exceeds the value of
> maxblocksize then the mmchconfig needs to be issued to increase the value
> of maxblocksize (which requires the entire cluster to be stopped).
>
> For clusters newly created with 5.0.0, the value of maxblocksize is set to
> 4MB. See the references to maxblocksize in the mmchconfig and mmcrfs man
> pages in 5.0.0 .
>
> Felipe
>
> ----
> Felipe Knop knop at us.ibm.com
> GPFS Development and Security
> IBM Systems
> IBM Building 008
> 2455 South Rd, Poughkeepsie, NY 12601
> (845) 433-9314 T/L 293-9314
>
>
>
> [image: Inactive hide details for "Uwe Falke" ---02/09/2018 06:54:10
> AM---I suppose the new maxBlockSize default is <>1MB, so your conf]"Uwe
> Falke" ---02/09/2018 06:54:10 AM---I suppose the new maxBlockSize default
> is <>1MB, so your config parameter was properly translated.
>
> From: "Uwe Falke" <UWEFALKE at de.ibm.com>
> To: gpfsug main discussion list <gpfsug-discuss at spectrumscale.org>
> Date: 02/09/2018 06:54 AM
> Subject: Re: [gpfsug-discuss] V5 Experience
> Sent by: gpfsug-discuss-bounces at spectrumscale.org
> ------------------------------
>
>
>
>
> I suppose the new maxBlockSize default is <>1MB, so your config parameter
> was properly translated. I'd see no need to change anything.
>
>
>
> Mit freundlichen Grüßen / Kind regards
>
>
> Dr. Uwe Falke
>
> IT Specialist
> High Performance Computing Services / Integrated Technology Services /
> Data Center Services
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> IBM Deutschland
> Rathausstr. 7
> 09111 Chemnitz
> Phone: +49 371 6978 2165 <+49%20371%2069782165>
> Mobile: +49 175 575 2877 <+49%20175%205752877>
> E-Mail: uwefalke at de.ibm.com
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> IBM Deutschland Business & Technology Services GmbH / Geschäftsführung:
> Thomas Wolter, Sven Schooß
> Sitz der Gesellschaft: Ehningen / Registergericht: Amtsgericht Stuttgart,
> HRB 17122
>
>
>
>
> From:   "Grunenberg, Renar" <Renar.Grunenberg at huk-coburg.de>
> To:     "'gpfsug-discuss at spectrumscale.org'"
> <gpfsug-discuss at spectrumscale.org>
> Date:   02/09/2018 10:16 AM
> Subject:        [gpfsug-discuss] V5 Experience
> Sent by:        gpfsug-discuss-bounces at spectrumscale.org
>
>
>
> Hallo All,
> we updated our Test-Cluster from 4.2.3.6 to V5.0.0.1. So good so fine, but
> I see after the mmchconfig release=LATEST a new common parameter
> ?maxblocksize 1M?
> (our fs are on these blocksizes) is happening.
> Ok, but if I will change this parameter the hole cluster was requestet
> that:
>
>  root @sbdl7003(rhel7.4)> mmchconfig maxblocksize=DEFAULT
> Verifying GPFS is stopped on all nodes ...
> mmchconfig: GPFS is still active on SAPL7012x1.t7.lan.tuhuk.de
> mmchconfig: GPFS is still active on SBDL7001x1.t7.lan.tuhuk.de
> mmchconfig: GPFS is still active on SAPL7013x1.t7.lan.tuhuk.de
> mmchconfig: GPFS is still active on SAPL7009x1.t7.lan.tuhuk.de
> mmchconfig: GPFS is still active on SAPL7008x1.t7.lan.tuhuk.de
> mmchconfig: GPFS is still active on SBDL7003x1.t7.lan.tuhuk.de
> mmchconfig: GPFS is still active on SBDL7004x1.t7.lan.tuhuk.de
> mmchconfig: GPFS is still active on SAPL7001x1.t7.lan.tuhuk.de
> mmchconfig: Command failed. Examine previous error messages to determine
> cause.
> Can someone explain the behavior here, and same clarification in an update
> plan what can we do to go to the defaults without clusterdown.
> Is this a bug or a feature;-)
>
> Regards Renar
> Renar Grunenberg
> Abteilung Informatik ? Betrieb
>
> HUK-COBURG
> Bahnhofsplatz
> 96444 Coburg
> Telefon:
> 09561 96-44110
> Telefax:
> 09561 96-44104
> E-Mail:
> Renar.Grunenberg at huk-coburg.de
> Internet:
> www.huk.de
> HUK-COBURG Haftpflicht-Unterstützungs-Kasse kraftfahrender Beamter
> Deutschlands a. G. in Coburg
> Reg.-Gericht Coburg HRB 100; St.-Nr. 9212/101/00021
> Sitz der Gesellschaft: Bahnhofsplatz, 96444 Coburg
> Vorsitzender des Aufsichtsrats: Prof. Dr. Heinrich R. Schradin.
> Vorstand: Klaus-Jürgen Heitmann (Sprecher), Stefan Gronbach, Dr. Hans Olav
> Herøy, Dr. Jörg Rheinländer (stv.), Sarah Rössler, Daniel Thomas (stv.).
> Diese Nachricht enthält vertrauliche und/oder rechtlich geschützte
> Informationen.
> Wenn Sie nicht der richtige Adressat sind oder diese Nachricht irrtümlich
> erhalten haben,
> informieren Sie bitte sofort den Absender und vernichten Sie diese
> Nachricht.
> Das unerlaubte Kopieren sowie die unbefugte Weitergabe dieser Nachricht
> ist nicht gestattet.
>
> This information may contain confidential and/or privileged information.
> If you are not the intended recipient (or have received this information
> in error) please notify the
> sender immediately and destroy this information.
> Any unauthorized copying, disclosure or distribution of the material in
> this information is strictly forbidden.
> _______________________________________________
> gpfsug-discuss mailing list
> gpfsug-discuss at spectrumscale.org
>
> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__gpfsug.org_mailman_listinfo_gpfsug-2Ddiscuss&d=DwIFAw&c=jf_iaSHvJObTbx-siA1ZOg&r=oNT2koCZX0xmWlSlLblR9Q&m=6lyCPEFGZrRBZrhH_iGlkum-CJi5MkJpfNnkOgs3mO0&s=VLofD771s6d1PyNl8EDOhntcFwAcZTrFbwdsWN9mcas&e=
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> gpfsug-discuss mailing list
> gpfsug-discuss at spectrumscale.org
>
> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__gpfsug.org_mailman_listinfo_gpfsug-2Ddiscuss&d=DwIFAw&c=jf_iaSHvJObTbx-siA1ZOg&r=oNT2koCZX0xmWlSlLblR9Q&m=6lyCPEFGZrRBZrhH_iGlkum-CJi5MkJpfNnkOgs3mO0&s=VLofD771s6d1PyNl8EDOhntcFwAcZTrFbwdsWN9mcas&e=
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> gpfsug-discuss mailing list
> gpfsug-discuss at spectrumscale.org
> http://gpfsug.org/mailman/listinfo/gpfsug-discuss
>
> _______________________________________________
> gpfsug-discuss mailing list
> gpfsug-discuss at spectrumscale.org
> http://gpfsug.org/mailman/listinfo/gpfsug-discuss
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://gpfsug.org/pipermail/gpfsug-discuss_gpfsug.org/attachments/20180209/3cdf3e42/attachment.htm>


More information about the gpfsug-discuss mailing list