[gpfsug-discuss] Antwort: [Newsletter] Re: gpfs.so vfs samba module is missing ***CAUTION_Invalid_Signature***

[Matthias.Knigge at rohde-schwarz.com]

https://manpages.debian.org/testing/samba-vfs-modules/vfs_gpfs.8.en.html

I do not think so, the module is a part of samba. I installed the package 
gpfs.smb too but with the same result. Before I use the normal version of 
samba I used the version of sernet. There was the module available. Now I 
am working with CentOS 7.3 and samba of the offical repository of CentOS.

Thanks,
Matthias




Von:    valdis.kletnieks at vt.edu
An:     gpfsug main discussion list <gpfsug-discuss at spectrumscale.org>
Datum:  17.11.2017 17:51
Betreff:        [Newsletter] Re: [gpfsug-discuss] gpfs.so vfs samba module 
is missing ***CAUTION_Invalid_Signature***
Gesendet von:   gpfsug-discuss-bounces at spectrumscale.org



On Fri, 17 Nov 2017 14:39:47 +0100, Matthias.Knigge at rohde-schwarz.com 
said:

> anyone know in which package I can find the gpfs vfs module? Currently I
> am working with gpfs 4.2.3.0 and Samba 4.4.4. Normally the samba package
> provides the vfs module. I updated Samba to 4.6.2 but the 
gpfs-vfs-module
> is still missing.

If you're running the IBM-supported protocols server config, you want the 
rpm 'gpfs.smb'.

If you're trying to build your own, your best bet is to punt and install 
the IBM code. ;)
_______________________________________________
gpfsug-discuss mailing list
gpfsug-discuss at spectrumscale.org
http://gpfsug.org/mailman/listinfo/gpfsug-discuss
[Anhang "RohdeSchwarzSecure_E-Mail.html" gelöscht von Matthias Knigge/DVS] 


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://gpfsug.org/pipermail/gpfsug-discuss_gpfsug.org/attachments/20171117/72c6cd10/attachment.htm>