[gpfsug-discuss] What is an independent fileset? was: mmbackup with fileset : scope errors

Marc A Kaplan makaplan at us.ibm.com
Thu May 18 15:23:30 BST 2017


Jaime,

  While we're waiting for the mmbackup expert to weigh in, notice that the 
mmbackup command does have a -P option that allows you to provide a 
customized policy rules file.

So... a fairly safe hack is to do a trial mmbackup run, capture the 
automatically generated policy file, and then augment it with FOR 
FILESET('fileset-I-want-to-backup') clauses.... Then run the mmbackup for 
real with your customized policy file.

mmbackup uses mmapplypolicy which by itself is happy to limit its 
directory scan to a particular fileset by using

mmapplypolicy /path-to-any-directory-within-a-gpfs-filesystem --scope 
fileset ....

However, mmbackup probably has other worries and for simpliciity and 
helping make sure you get complete, sensible backups, apparently has 
imposed some restrictions to preserve sanity (yours and our support team! 
;-) )  ...   (For example, suppose you were doing incremental backups, 
starting at different paths each time? -- happy to do so, but when 
disaster strikes and you want to restore -- you'll end up confused and/or 
unhappy!)

"converting from one fileset to another" --- sorry there is no such thing. 
 Filesets are kinda like little filesystems within filesystems.  Moving a 
file from one fileset to another requires a copy operation.   There is no 
fast move nor hardlinking. 

--marc



From:   "Jaime Pinto" <pinto at scinet.utoronto.ca>
To:     "gpfsug main discussion list" <gpfsug-discuss at spectrumscale.org>, 
"Marc   A Kaplan" <makaplan at us.ibm.com>
Date:   05/18/2017 09:58 AM
Subject:        Re: [gpfsug-discuss] What is an independent fileset? was: 
mmbackup        with fileset : scope errors



Thanks for the explanation Mark and Luis,

It begs the question: why filesets are created as dependent by 
default, if the adverse repercussions can be so great afterward? Even 
in my case, where I manage GPFS and TSM deployments (and I have been 
around for a while), didn't realize at all that not adding and extra 
option at fileset creation time would cause me huge trouble with 
scaling later on as I try to use mmbackup.

When you have different groups to manage file systems and backups that 
don't read each-other's manuals ahead of time then we have a really 
bad recipe.

I'm looking forward to your explanation as to why mmbackup cares one 
way or another.

I'm also hoping for a hint as to how to configure backup exclusion 
rules on the TSM side to exclude fileset traversing on the GPFS side. 
Is mmbackup smart enough (actually smarter than TSM client itself) to 
read the exclusion rules on the TSM configuration and apply them 
before traversing?

Thanks
Jaime

Quoting "Marc A Kaplan" <makaplan at us.ibm.com>:

> When I see "independent fileset" (in Spectrum/GPFS/Scale)  I always 
think
> and try to read that as "inode space".
>
> An "independent fileset" has all the attributes of an (older-fashioned)
> dependent fileset PLUS all of its files are represented by inodes that 
are
> in a separable range of inode numbers - this allows GPFS to efficiently 
do
> snapshots of just that inode-space (uh... independent fileset)...
>
> And... of course the files of dependent filesets must also be 
represented
> by inodes -- those inode numbers are within the inode-space of whatever
> the containing independent fileset is... as was chosen when you created
> the fileset....   If you didn't say otherwise, inodes come from the
> default "root" fileset....
>
> Clear as your bath-water, no?
>
> So why does mmbackup care one way or another ???   Stay tuned....
>
> BTW - if you look at the bits of the inode numbers carefully --- you may
> not immediately discern what I mean by a "separable range of inode
> numbers" -- (very technical hint) you may need to permute the bit order
> before you discern a simple pattern...
>
>
>
> From:   "Luis Bolinches" <luis.bolinches at fi.ibm.com>
> To:     gpfsug-discuss at spectrumscale.org
> Cc:     gpfsug-discuss at spectrumscale.org
> Date:   05/18/2017 02:10 AM
> Subject:        Re: [gpfsug-discuss] mmbackup with fileset : scope 
errors
> Sent by:        gpfsug-discuss-bounces at spectrumscale.org
>
>
>
> Hi
>
> There is no direct way to convert the one fileset that is dependent to
> independent or viceversa.
>
> I would suggest to take a look to chapter 5 of the 2014 redbook, lots of
> definitions about GPFS ILM including filesets
> http://www.redbooks.ibm.com/abstracts/sg248254.html?Open Is not the only
> place that is explained but I honestly believe is a good single start
> point. It also needs an update as does nto have anything on CES nor ESS,
> so anyone in this list feel free to give feedback on that page people 
with
> funding decisions listen there.
>
> So you are limited to either migrate the data from that fileset to a new
> independent fileset (multiple ways to do that) or use the TSM client
> config.
>
> ----- Original message -----
> From: "Jaime Pinto" <pinto at scinet.utoronto.ca>
> Sent by: gpfsug-discuss-bounces at spectrumscale.org
> To: "gpfsug main discussion list" <gpfsug-discuss at spectrumscale.org>,
> "Jaime Pinto" <pinto at scinet.utoronto.ca>
> Cc:
> Subject: Re: [gpfsug-discuss] mmbackup with fileset : scope errors
> Date: Thu, May 18, 2017 4:43 AM
>
> There is hope. See reference link below:
> 
https://www.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/en/STXKQY_4.1.1/com.ibm.spectrum.scale.v4r11.ins.doc/bl1ins_tsm_fsvsfset.htm

>
>
> The issue has to do with dependent vs. independent filesets, something
> I didn't even realize existed until now. Our filesets are dependent
> (for no particular reason), so I have to find a way to turn them into
> independent.
>
> The proper option syntax is "--scope inodespace", and the error
> message actually flagged that out, however I didn't know how to
> interpret what I saw:
>
>
> # mmbackup /gpfs/sgfs1/sysadmin3 -N tsm-helper1-ib0 -s /dev/shm
> --scope inodespace --tsm-errorlog $logfile -L 2
> --------------------------------------------------------
> mmbackup: Backup of /gpfs/sgfs1/sysadmin3 begins at Wed May 17
> 21:27:43 EDT 2017.
> --------------------------------------------------------
> Wed May 17 21:27:45 2017 mmbackup:mmbackup: Backing up *dependent*
> fileset sysadmin3 is not supported
> Wed May 17 21:27:45 2017 mmbackup:This fileset is not suitable for
> fileset level backup.  exit 1
> --------------------------------------------------------
>
> Will post the outcome.
> Jaime
>
>
>
> Quoting "Jaime Pinto" <pinto at scinet.utoronto.ca>:
>
>> Quoting "Luis Bolinches" <luis.bolinches at fi.ibm.com>:
>>
>>> Hi
>>>
>>> have you tried to add exceptions on the TSM client config file?
>>
>> Hey Luis,
>>
>> That would work as well (mechanically), however it's not elegant or
>> efficient. When you have over 1PB and 200M files on scratch it will
>> take many hours and several helper nodes to traverse that fileset just
>> to be negated by TSM. In fact exclusion on TSM are just as inefficient.
>> Considering that I want to keep project and sysadmin on different
>> domains then it's much worst, since we have to traverse and exclude
>> scratch & (project|sysadmin) twice, once to capture sysadmin and again
>> to capture project.
>>
>> If I have to use exclusion rules it has to rely sole on gpfs rules, and
>> somehow not traverse scratch at all.
>>
>> I suspect there is a way to do this properly, however the examples on
>> the gpfs guide and other references are not exhaustive. They only show
>> a couple of trivial cases.
>>
>> However my situation is not unique. I suspect there are may facilities
>> having to deal with backup of HUGE filesets.
>>
>> So the search is on.
>>
>> Thanks
>> Jaime
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>>
>>> Assuming your GPFS dir is /IBM/GPFS and your fileset to exclude is
> linked
>>> on /IBM/GPFS/FSET1
>>>
>>> dsm.sys
>>> ...
>>>
>>> DOMAIN /IBM/GPFS
>>> EXCLUDE.DIR /IBM/GPFS/FSET1
>>>
>>>
>>> From:   "Jaime Pinto" <pinto at scinet.utoronto.ca>
>>> To:     "gpfsug main discussion list"
> <gpfsug-discuss at spectrumscale.org>
>>> Date:   17-05-17 23:44
>>> Subject:        [gpfsug-discuss] mmbackup with fileset : scope errors
>>> Sent by:        gpfsug-discuss-bounces at spectrumscale.org
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> I have a g200 /gpfs/sgfs1 filesystem with 3 filesets:
>>> * project3
>>> * scratch3
>>> * sysadmin3
>>>
>>> I have no problems mmbacking up /gpfs/sgfs1 (or sgfs1), however we
>>> have no need or space to include *scratch3* on TSM.
>>>
>>> Question: how to craft the mmbackup command to backup
>>> /gpfs/sgfs1/project3 and/or /gpfs/sgfs1/sysadmin3 only?
>>>
>>> Below are 3 types of errors:
>>>
>>> 1) mmbackup /gpfs/sgfs1/sysadmin3 -N tsm-helper1-ib0 -s /dev/shm
>>> --tsm-errorlog $logfile -L 2
>>>
>>> ERROR: mmbackup: Options /gpfs/sgfs1/sysadmin3 and --scope filesystem
>>> cannot be specified at the same time.
>>>
>>> 2) mmbackup /gpfs/sgfs1/sysadmin3 -N tsm-helper1-ib0 -s /dev/shm
>>> --scope inodespace --tsm-errorlog $logfile -L 2
>>>
>>> ERROR: Wed May 17 16:27:11 2017 mmbackup:mmbackup: Backing up
>>> dependent fileset sysadmin3 is not supported
>>> Wed May 17 16:27:11 2017 mmbackup:This fileset is not suitable for
>>> fileset level backup.  exit 1
>>>
>>> 3) mmbackup /gpfs/sgfs1/sysadmin3 -N tsm-helper1-ib0 -s /dev/shm
>>> --scope filesystem --tsm-errorlog $logfile -L 2
>>>
>>> ERROR: mmbackup: Options /gpfs/sgfs1/sysadmin3 and --scope filesystem
>>> cannot be specified at the same time.
>>>
>>> These examples don't really cover my case:
>>>
> 
https://www.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/en/STXKQY_4.2.3/com.ibm.spectrum.scale.v4r23.doc/bl1adm_mmbackup.htm#mmbackup__mmbackup_examples

>
>>>
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>> Jaime
>>>
>>>
>>>          ************************************
>>>           TELL US ABOUT YOUR SUCCESS STORIES
>>>          http://www.scinethpc.ca/testimonials
>>>          ************************************
>>> ---
>>> Jaime Pinto
>>> SciNet HPC Consortium - Compute/Calcul Canada
>>> www.scinet.utoronto.ca - www.computecanada.ca
>>> University of Toronto
>>> 661 University Ave. (MaRS), Suite 1140
>>> Toronto, ON, M5G1M1
>>> P: 416-978-2755
>>> C: 416-505-1477
>>>
>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------
>>> This message was sent using IMP at SciNet Consortium, University of
>>> Toronto.
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> gpfsug-discuss mailing list
>>> gpfsug-discuss at spectrumscale.org
>>> http://gpfsug.org/mailman/listinfo/gpfsug-discuss
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Ellei edellä ole toisin mainittu: / Unless stated otherwise above:
>>> Oy IBM Finland Ab
>>> PL 265, 00101 Helsinki, Finland
>>> Business ID, Y-tunnus: 0195876-3
>>> Registered in Finland
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>          ************************************
>>           TELL US ABOUT YOUR SUCCESS STORIES
>>          http://www.scinethpc.ca/testimonials
>>          ************************************
>> ---
>> Jaime Pinto
>> SciNet HPC Consortium - Compute/Calcul Canada
>> www.scinet.utoronto.ca - www.computecanada.ca
>> University of Toronto
>> 661 University Ave. (MaRS), Suite 1140
>> Toronto, ON, M5G1M1
>> P: 416-978-2755
>> C: 416-505-1477
>>
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------
>> This message was sent using IMP at SciNet Consortium, University of
> Toronto.
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> gpfsug-discuss mailing list
>> gpfsug-discuss at spectrumscale.org
>> http://gpfsug.org/mailman/listinfo/gpfsug-discuss
>>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>           ************************************
>            TELL US ABOUT YOUR SUCCESS STORIES
>           http://www.scinethpc.ca/testimonials
>           ************************************
> ---
> Jaime Pinto
> SciNet HPC Consortium - Compute/Calcul Canada
> www.scinet.utoronto.ca - www.computecanada.ca
> University of Toronto
> 661 University Ave. (MaRS), Suite 1140
> Toronto, ON, M5G1M1
> P: 416-978-2755
> C: 416-505-1477
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> This message was sent using IMP at SciNet Consortium, University of
> Toronto.
>
> _______________________________________________
> gpfsug-discuss mailing list
> gpfsug-discuss at spectrumscale.org
> http://gpfsug.org/mailman/listinfo/gpfsug-discuss
>
>
>
> Ellei edellä ole toisin mainittu: / Unless stated otherwise above:
> Oy IBM Finland Ab
> PL 265, 00101 Helsinki, Finland
> Business ID, Y-tunnus: 0195876-3
> Registered in Finland
> _______________________________________________
> gpfsug-discuss mailing list
> gpfsug-discuss at spectrumscale.org
> http://gpfsug.org/mailman/listinfo/gpfsug-discuss
>
>
>
>
>






          ************************************
           TELL US ABOUT YOUR SUCCESS STORIES
          http://www.scinethpc.ca/testimonials
          ************************************
---
Jaime Pinto
SciNet HPC Consortium - Compute/Calcul Canada
www.scinet.utoronto.ca - www.computecanada.ca
University of Toronto
661 University Ave. (MaRS), Suite 1140
Toronto, ON, M5G1M1
P: 416-978-2755
C: 416-505-1477

----------------------------------------------------------------
This message was sent using IMP at SciNet Consortium, University of 
Toronto.





-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://gpfsug.org/pipermail/gpfsug-discuss_gpfsug.org/attachments/20170518/d7bf41fc/attachment.htm>


More information about the gpfsug-discuss mailing list