[gpfsug-discuss] Tiebreaker disk question

Jan-Frode Myklebust janfrode at tanso.net
Thu May 4 06:27:11 BST 2017


This doesn't sound like normal behaviour. It shouldn't matter which
filesystem your tiebreaker disks belong to. I think the failure was caused
by something else, but am not able to guess from the little information you
posted.. The mmfs.log will probably tell you the reason.


-jf

ons. 3. mai 2017 kl. 19.08 skrev Shaun Anderson <SAnderson at convergeone.com>:

> We noticed some odd behavior recently.  I have a customer with a small
> Scale (with Archive on top) configuration that we recently updated to a
> dual node configuration.  We are using CES and setup a very small 3
> nsd shared-root filesystem(gpfssr).  We also set up tiebreaker disks and
> figured it would be ok to use the gpfssr NSDs for this purpose.
>
>
> When we tried to perform some basic failover testing, both nodes came
> down.  It appears from the logs that when we initiated the node failure
> (via mmshutdown command...not great, I know) it unmounts and remounts the
> shared-root filesystem.  When it did this, the cluster lost access to the
> tiebreaker disks, figured it had lost quorum and the other node came down
> as well.
>
>
> We got around this by changing the tiebreaker disks to our other normal
> gpfs filesystem.  After that failover worked as expected.  This is
> documented nowhere as far as I could find​.  I wanted to know if anybody
> else had experienced this and if this is expected behavior.  All is well
> now and operating as we want so I don't think we'll pursue a support
> request.
>
>
> Regards,
>
> *SHAUN ANDERSON*
> STORAGE ARCHITECT
> O 208.577.2112
> M 214.263.7014
>
>
> NOTICE: This email message and any attachments here to may contain
> confidential
> information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure, or distribution of
> such
> information is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please
> contact
> the sender by reply email and destroy the original message and all copies
> of it.
> _______________________________________________
> gpfsug-discuss mailing list
> gpfsug-discuss at spectrumscale.org
> http://gpfsug.org/mailman/listinfo/gpfsug-discuss
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://gpfsug.org/pipermail/gpfsug-discuss_gpfsug.org/attachments/20170504/54cf6481/attachment.htm>


More information about the gpfsug-discuss mailing list