[gpfsug-discuss] -Y option for many commands, precious few officially!
Simon Thompson (Research Computing - IT Services)
S.J.Thompson at bham.ac.uk
Tue Mar 28 17:51:12 BST 2017
Come to one of the user group events going on around the world in the next
few months.
NERSC, Berkeley, USA, 4th/5th April:
https://www.nersc.gov/research-and-development/data-analytics/spectrum-user
-group-meeting/
*** REGISTRATION CLOSES TOMORROW 29th ***
Sydney, Australia, 27th April:
https://www.eventbrite.com/e/spectrum-scale-user-group-australia-gpfsugaus-
april-2017-tickets-29136246297
Manchester, UK, 9th/10th May:
https://www.eventbrite.com/e/spectrum-scalegpfs-user-group-spring-2017-regi
stration-32113696932
I know the presence of the -Y flag has been discussed there, so its a
great place to pick up tips!
Simon
On 28/03/2017, 17:37, "gpfsug-discuss-bounces at spectrumscale.org on behalf
of Jonathon A Anderson" <gpfsug-discuss-bounces at spectrumscale.org on
behalf of jonathon.anderson at colorado.edu> wrote:
>Sure; but that only helps if you know the flag even exists.
>
>~jonathon
>
>
>On 3/28/17, 10:37 AM, "gpfsug-discuss-bounces at spectrumscale.org on behalf
>of Simon Thompson (Research Computing - IT Services)"
><gpfsug-discuss-bounces at spectrumscale.org on behalf of
>S.J.Thompson at bham.ac.uk> wrote:
>
> I thought the header rows defined what the format of the output was.
>Its a bit weird as there can be multiple header rows for different
>content rows ...
>
>
> Simon
>
>
> From: <gpfsug-discuss-bounces at spectrumscale.org> on behalf of Marc A
>Kaplan <makaplan at us.ibm.com>
> Reply-To: "gpfsug-discuss at spectrumscale.org"
><gpfsug-discuss at spectrumscale.org>
> Date: Tuesday, 28 March 2017 at 17:14
> To: "gpfsug-discuss at spectrumscale.org"
><gpfsug-discuss at spectrumscale.org>
> Subject: Re: [gpfsug-discuss] -Y option for many commands, precious
>few officially!
>
>
>
> Just looking/scanning the latest (4.2.2) Spectrum Scale Command (and
>Programming) Reference I only found a few commands that officially are
>documented as supporting a -Y option: mmnfs, mmsmb, mmuserauth.
>
> But as many of you have discovered, -Y is accepted and yields
>"interesting" output for many of the mmXXXX commands.
> Moreover the output *seems to* have easily discernible patterns that
>can be parsed by simple programs.
>
> I believe there is no guarantee that the exact command output formats
>will not change from release to release, so, as a practical matter, if
>you're going to parse command output, you're probably better off parsing
>the -Y output,
> even if that is not officially supported.
>
>
>
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>gpfsug-discuss mailing list
>gpfsug-discuss at spectrumscale.org
>http://gpfsug.org/mailman/listinfo/gpfsug-discuss
More information about the gpfsug-discuss
mailing list