[gpfsug-discuss] mmrepquota and group names in GPFS 4.2.2.x

Thu Jan 19 21:22:40 GMT 2017

It's not something to do with the value of the GID, like being less or greater than some number?

________________________________
From: gpfsug-discuss-bounces at spectrumscale.org <gpfsug-discuss-bounces at spectrumscale.org> on behalf of Olaf Weiser <olaf.weiser at de.ibm.com>
Sent: Friday, 20 January 2017 3:16 AM
To: gpfsug main discussion list
Subject: Re: [gpfsug-discuss] mmrepquota and group names in GPFS 4.2.2.x

in my eyes.. that's the hint .. not to wait until all 700 clients 'll have been updated .. before open PMR .. ;-) ...

From:        Lukas Hejtmanek <xhejtman at ics.muni.cz>
To:        gpfsug main discussion list <gpfsug-discuss at spectrumscale.org>
Date:        01/19/2017 05:37 PM
Subject:        Re: [gpfsug-discuss] mmrepquota and group names in GPFS 4.2.2.x
Sent by:        gpfsug-discuss-bounces at spectrumscale.org
________________________________

Just leting know, I see the same problem with 4.2.2.1 version. mmrepquota
resolves only some of group names.

On Thu, Jan 19, 2017 at 04:25:20PM +0000, Buterbaugh, Kevin L wrote:
> Hi Olaf,
>
> We will continue upgrading clients in a rolling fashion, but with ~700 of them, it’ll be a few weeks.  And to me that’s good … I don’t consider figuring out why this is happening a waste of time and therefore having systems on both versions is a good thing.
>
> While I would prefer not to paste actual group names and GIDs into this public forum, I can assure you that on every 4.2.1.1 system that I have tried this on:
>
> 1.  mmrepquota reports mostly GIDs, only a few group names
> 2.  /etc/nsswitch.conf says to look at files first
> 3.  the GID is in /etc/group
> 4.  length of group name doesn’t matter
>
> I have a support contract with IBM, so I can open a PMR if necessary.  I just thought someone on the list might have an idea as to what is happening or be able to point out the obvious explanation that I’m missing.  ;-)
>
> Thanks…
>
> Kevin
>
> On Jan 19, 2017, at 10:05 AM, Olaf Weiser <olaf.weiser at de.ibm.com<mailto:olaf.weiser at de.ibm.com>> wrote:
>
> unfortunately , I don't own a cluster right now, which has 4.2.2 to double check... SpectrumScale should resolve the GID into a name, if it find the name somewhere...
>
> but in your case.. I would say.. before we waste to much time in a version-mismatch issue.. finish the rolling migration, especially RHEL .. and then we continue
> meanwhile  -I'll try to find a way for me here to setup up an 4.2.2. cluster
> cheers
>
>
>
> From:        "Buterbaugh, Kevin L" <Kevin.Buterbaugh at Vanderbilt.Edu<mailto:Kevin.Buterbaugh at Vanderbilt.Edu>>
> To:        gpfsug main discussion list <gpfsug-discuss at spectrumscale.org<mailto:gpfsug-discuss at spectrumscale.org>>
> Date:        01/19/2017 04:48 PM
> Subject:        Re: [gpfsug-discuss] mmrepquota and group names in GPFS 4.2.2.x
> Sent by:        gpfsug-discuss-bounces at spectrumscale.org<mailto:gpfsug-discuss-bounces at spectrumscale.org>
> ________________________________
>
>
>
> Hi Olaf,
>
> The filesystem manager runs on one of our servers, all of which are upgraded to 4.2.2.x.
>
> Also, I didn’t mention this yesterday but our /etc/nsswitch.conf has “files” listed first for /etc/group.
>
> In addition to a mixture of GPFS versions, we also have a mixture of OS versions (RHEL 6/7).  AFAIK tell with all of my testing / experimenting the only factor that seems to change the behavior of mmrepquota in regards to GIDs versus group names is the GPFS version.
>
> Other ideas, anyone?  Is anyone else in a similar situation and can test whether they see similar behavior?
>
> Thanks...
>
> Kevin
>
> On Jan 19, 2017, at 2:45 AM, Olaf Weiser <olaf.weiser at de.ibm.com<mailto:olaf.weiser at de.ibm.com>> wrote:
>
> have you checked, where th fsmgr runs as you have nodes with different code levels
>
> mmlsmgr
>
>
>
>
> From:        "Buterbaugh, Kevin L" <Kevin.Buterbaugh at Vanderbilt.Edu<mailto:Kevin.Buterbaugh at Vanderbilt.Edu>>
> To:        gpfsug main discussion list <gpfsug-discuss at spectrumscale.org<mailto:gpfsug-discuss at spectrumscale.org>>
> Date:        01/18/2017 04:57 PM
> Subject:        [gpfsug-discuss] mmrepquota and group names in GPFS 4.2.2.x
> Sent by:        gpfsug-discuss-bounces at spectrumscale.org<mailto:gpfsug-discuss-bounces at spectrumscale.org>
> ________________________________
>
>
>
> Hi All,
>
> We recently upgraded our cluster (well, the servers are all upgraded; the clients are still in progress) from GPFS 4.2.1.1 to GPFS 4.2.2.1 and there appears to be a change in how mmrepquota handles group names in its’ output.  I’m trying to get a handle on it, because it is messing with some of my scripts and - more importantly - because I don’t understand the behavior.
>
> From one of my clients which is still running GPFS 4.2.1.1 I can run an “mmrepquota -g <fs>” and if the group exists in /etc/group the group name is displayed.  Of course, if the group doesn’t exist in /etc/group, the GID is displayed.  Makes sense.
>
> However, on my servers which have been upgraded to GPFS 4.2.2.1 most - but not all - of the time I see GID numbers instead of group names.  My question is, what is the criteria GPFS 4.2.2.x is using to decide when to display a GID instead of a group name?  It’s apparently *not* the length of the name of the group, because I have output in front of me where a 13 character long group name is displayed but a 7 character long group name is *not* displayed - its’ GID is instead (and yes, both exist in /etc/group).
>
> I know that sample output would be useful to illustrate this, but I do not want to post group names or GIDs to a public mailing list … if you want to know what those are, you’ll have to ask Vladimir Putin… ;-)
>
> I am in the process of updating scripts to use “mmrepquota -gn <fs>” and then looking up the group name myself, but I want to try to understand this.  Thanks…
>
> Kevin
>
>
> —
> Kevin Buterbaugh - Senior System Administrator
> Vanderbilt University - Advanced Computing Center for Research and Education
> Kevin.Buterbaugh at vanderbilt.edu<mailto:Kevin.Buterbaugh at vanderbilt.edu>- (615)875-9633
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> gpfsug-discuss mailing list
> gpfsug-discuss at spectrumscale.org<http://spectrumscale.org<http://spectrumscale.org/>>
> http://gpfsug.org/mailman/listinfo/gpfsug-discuss
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> gpfsug-discuss mailing list
> gpfsug-discuss at spectrumscale.org<http://spectrumscale.org<http://spectrumscale.org/>>
> http://gpfsug.org/mailman/listinfo/gpfsug-discuss
>

> _______________________________________________
> gpfsug-discuss mailing list
> gpfsug-discuss at spectrumscale.org
> http://gpfsug.org/mailman/listinfo/gpfsug-discuss

--
Lukáš Hejtmánek
_______________________________________________
gpfsug-discuss mailing list
gpfsug-discuss at spectrumscale.org
http://gpfsug.org/mailman/listinfo/gpfsug-discuss

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://gpfsug.org/pipermail/gpfsug-discuss_gpfsug.org/attachments/20170119/9ca56506/attachment.htm>