[gpfsug-discuss] SMB issues

[Simon Thompson (Research Computing - IT Services)]

Its still open. I can say we are happily running 4.2.2, just not the SMB
packages that go with it. So the GPFS part, I wouldn't have thought would
be a problem to upgrade.

Simon

On 04/01/2017, 09:06, "gpfsug-discuss-bounces at spectrumscale.org on behalf
of Sobey, Richard A" <gpfsug-discuss-bounces at spectrumscale.org on behalf
of r.sobey at imperial.ac.uk> wrote:

>Simon,
>
>Is this PMR still open or was the issue resolved? I'm very interested to
>know as 4.2.2 is on my roadmap.
>
>Thanks
>Richard
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: gpfsug-discuss-bounces at spectrumscale.org
>[mailto:gpfsug-discuss-bounces at spectrumscale.org] On Behalf Of Simon
>Thompson (Research Computing - IT Services)
>Sent: 20 December 2016 17:14
>To: gpfsug main discussion list <gpfsug-discuss at spectrumscale.org>
>Subject: Re: [gpfsug-discuss] SMB issues
>
>
>Nope, just lots of messages with the same error, but different folders.
>
>I've opened a pmr with IBM and supplied the usual logs.
>
>Simon
>________________________________________
>From: gpfsug-discuss-bounces at spectrumscale.org
>[gpfsug-discuss-bounces at spectrumscale.org] on behalf of Christof Schmitt
>[christof.schmitt at us.ibm.com]
>Sent: 19 December 2016 17:31
>To: gpfsug main discussion list
>Subject: Re: [gpfsug-discuss] SMB issues
>
>From this message, it does not look like a known problem. Are there other
>messages leading up to the one you mentioned?
>
>I would suggest reporting this through a PMR.
>
>Christof Schmitt || IBM || Spectrum Scale Development || Tucson, AZ
>christof.schmitt at us.ibm.com  ||  +1-520-799-2469    (T/L: 321-2469)
>
>
>
>From:   "Simon Thompson (Research Computing - IT Services)"
><S.J.Thompson at bham.ac.uk>
>To:     "gpfsug-discuss at spectrumscale.org"
><gpfsug-discuss at spectrumscale.org>
>Date:   12/19/2016 08:37 AM
>Subject:        [gpfsug-discuss] SMB issues
>Sent by:        gpfsug-discuss-bounces at spectrumscale.org
>
>
>
>Hi All,
>
>We upgraded to 4.2.2.0 last week as well as to
>gpfs.smb-4.4.6_gpfs_8-1.el7.x86_64.rpm from the 4.2.2.0 protocols bundle.
>
>We've since been getting random users reporting that they get access
>denied errors when trying to access folders. Some seem to work fine and
>others not, but it seems to vary and change by user (for example this
>morning, I could see all my folders fine, but later I could only see
>some). From my Mac connecting to the SMB shares, I could connect fine to
>the share, but couldn't list files in the folder (I guess this is what
>users were seeing from Windows as access denied).
>
>In the log.smbd, we are seeing errors such as this:
>
>[2016/12/19 15:20:40.649580,  0]
>../source3/lib/sysquotas.c:457(sys_get_quota)
>  sys_path_to_bdev() failed for path [FOLDERNAME_HERE]!
>
>
>
>Reverting to the previous version of SMB we were running
>(gpfs.smb-4.3.9_gpfs_21-1.el7.x86_64), the problems go away.
>
>Before I log a PMR, has anyone else seen this behaviour or have any
>suggestions?
>
>Thanks
>
>Simon
>
>_______________________________________________
>gpfsug-discuss mailing list
>gpfsug-discuss at spectrumscale.org
>http://gpfsug.org/mailman/listinfo/gpfsug-discuss
>
>
>
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>gpfsug-discuss mailing list
>gpfsug-discuss at spectrumscale.org
>http://gpfsug.org/mailman/listinfo/gpfsug-discuss
>_______________________________________________
>gpfsug-discuss mailing list
>gpfsug-discuss at spectrumscale.org
>http://gpfsug.org/mailman/listinfo/gpfsug-discuss
>_______________________________________________
>gpfsug-discuss mailing list
>gpfsug-discuss at spectrumscale.org
>http://gpfsug.org/mailman/listinfo/gpfsug-discuss