[gpfsug-discuss] GPFS 4.2.3.4 question

Buterbaugh, Kevin L Kevin.Buterbaugh at Vanderbilt.Edu
Tue Aug 29 16:53:51 BST 2017


Hi Richard,

Since I upgraded my cluster to GPFS 4.2.3.4 over the weekend IBM created an efix for it for the NSD deletion / creation fix.  I’m sure they’ll give it to you, too…  ;-)

Kevin

On Aug 29, 2017, at 9:30 AM, Sobey, Richard A <r.sobey at imperial.ac.uk<mailto:r.sobey at imperial.ac.uk>> wrote:

So I can upgrade to 4.2.3-4 to get the mmrestripe fix, or 4.2.3-3 efix3 to get the NSD deletion and creation fix? Not great when on Monday I’m doing a load of all this. What’s the recommendation? Is there a one size fits all patch?

From: gpfsug-discuss-bounces at spectrumscale.org<mailto:gpfsug-discuss-bounces at spectrumscale.org> [mailto:gpfsug-discuss-bounces at spectrumscale.org] On Behalf Of Frederick Stock
Sent: 27 August 2017 01:35
To: gpfsug main discussion list <gpfsug-discuss at spectrumscale.org<mailto:gpfsug-discuss at spectrumscale.org>>
Subject: Re: [gpfsug-discuss] GPFS 4.2.3.4 question

The only change missing is the change delivered  in 4.2.3 PTF3 efix3 which was provided on August 22.  The problem had to do with NSD deletion and creation.

Fred
__________________________________________________
Fred Stock | IBM Pittsburgh Lab | 720-430-8821
stockf at us.ibm.com<mailto:stockf at us.ibm.com>



From:        "Buterbaugh, Kevin L" <Kevin.Buterbaugh at Vanderbilt.Edu<mailto:Kevin.Buterbaugh at Vanderbilt.Edu>>
To:        gpfsug main discussion list <gpfsug-discuss at spectrumscale.org<mailto:gpfsug-discuss at spectrumscale.org>>
Date:        08/26/2017 03:40 PM
Subject:        [gpfsug-discuss] GPFS 4.2.3.4 question
Sent by:        gpfsug-discuss-bounces at spectrumscale.org<mailto:gpfsug-discuss-bounces at spectrumscale.org>
________________________________



Hi All,

Does anybody know if GPFS 4.2.3.4, which came out today, contains all the patches that are in GPFS 4.2.3.3 efix3?

If anybody does, and can respond, I’d greatly appreciate it.  Our cluster is in a very, very bad state right now and we may need to just take it down and bring it back up.  I was already planning on rolling out GPFS 4.2.3.3 efix 3 over the next few weeks anyway, so if I can just go to 4.2.3.4 that would be great…

Thanks!

—
Kevin Buterbaugh - Senior System Administrator
Vanderbilt University - Advanced Computing Center for Research and Education
Kevin.Buterbaugh at vanderbilt.edu<mailto:Kevin.Buterbaugh at vanderbilt.edu>- (615)875-9633


_______________________________________________
gpfsug-discuss mailing list
gpfsug-discuss at spectrumscale.org<http://spectrumscale.org/>
https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__gpfsug.org_mailman_listinfo_gpfsug-2Ddiscuss&d=DwICAg&c=jf_iaSHvJObTbx-siA1ZOg&r=p_1XEUyoJ7-VJxF_w8h9gJh8_Wj0Pey73LCLLoxodpw&m=7r9GsD1C2HiY4j21vPYIoQPHXePHxeMhzQeaw_ne4lM&s=-SFnqoJw--FN3wqClEEBGa9-XSLljgSseIU_SxGoWy0&e=


_______________________________________________
gpfsug-discuss mailing list
gpfsug-discuss at spectrumscale.org<http://spectrumscale.org/>
http://gpfsug.org/mailman/listinfo/gpfsug-discuss

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://gpfsug.org/pipermail/gpfsug-discuss_gpfsug.org/attachments/20170829/c182312a/attachment.htm>


More information about the gpfsug-discuss mailing list