[gpfsug-discuss] cross-cluster mounting different versions of gpfs
Konstantin Arnold
konstantin.arnold at unibas.ch
Tue Mar 15 22:22:17 GMT 2016
It's definitely doable, besides --version mentioned byJan-Frode, just a
two things to consider (when cluster started as 3.5 or earlier version)
we stumbled across:
- keys nistCompliance=SP800-131A: we had to regenerate and exchange new
keys with nistCompliance before old cluster could talk to new remotecluster
- maxblocksize: you would want ESS to run with maxblocksize 16M -
cluster with 3.5 probably has set a smaller value (default 1M) and to
change that you have to stop GPFS
Best
Konstantin
On 03/15/2016 10:50 PM, Jan-Frode Myklebust wrote:
> Not sure about cluster features, but at minimum you'll need to create
> the filesystem with low enough mmcrfs --version string.
>
>
>
>
> -jf
>
> tir. 15. mar. 2016 kl. 21.32 skrev Damir Krstic <damir.krstic at gmail.com
> <mailto:damir.krstic at gmail.com>>:
>
> We are deploying ESS with Spectrum Scale 4.2. Our compute cluster is
> running GPFS 3.5. We will remote cluster mount ESS to our compute
> cluster. When looking at GPFS coexistance documents, it is not clear
> whether GPFS 3.5 cluster can remote mount GPFS 4.2. Does anyone know
> if there are any issues in remote mounting GPFS 4.2 cluster on 3.5
> cluster?
>
> Thanks,
> Damir
> _______________________________________________
> gpfsug-discuss mailing list
> gpfsug-discuss at spectrumscale.org <http://spectrumscale.org>
> http://gpfsug.org/mailman/listinfo/gpfsug-discuss
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> gpfsug-discuss mailing list
> gpfsug-discuss at spectrumscale.org
> http://gpfsug.org/mailman/listinfo/gpfsug-discuss
>
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Konstantin Arnold | University of Basel & SIB
Klingelbergstrasse 50/70 | CH-4056 Basel | Phone: +41 61 267 15 82
Email: konstantin.arnold at unibas.ch
More information about the gpfsug-discuss
mailing list