[gpfsug-discuss] question about why unix extensions = no is recommended when using samba + gpfs?

Sabuj Pattanayek sabujp at gmail.com
Thu Apr 3 18:26:00 BST 2014


I was able to do SMB2 (at least in terms of performance over SMBv1) with
> sharemodes = yes or sharemodes = no. Durable / persistent handles don't
> work in that active read/write I/O will not continue if  smb/ctdb is
> disabled on one of the samba nodes. The client will not have to
> re-map/re-connect but any active I/O other than file deletions and perhaps
> metadata operations will continue unaffected.
>

should be "any active I/O other than file deletions and perhaps metadata
operations will be disrupted"
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://gpfsug.org/pipermail/gpfsug-discuss_gpfsug.org/attachments/20140403/9b0bf53a/attachment.htm>


More information about the gpfsug-discuss mailing list